Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Article
Brief Report
Case Report
Commentary
Community Case Study
Editorial
Image
Images
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Mini Review
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Review Article
Reviewers; List
Short Communication
Task Force Report
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Article
Brief Report
Case Report
Commentary
Community Case Study
Editorial
Image
Images
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Mini Review
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Review Article
Reviewers; List
Short Communication
Task Force Report
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/ANAMS_254_2025

Current trends of biologic therapies in uveitis and scleritis

Department of Uvea & Ocular Pathology, Medical and Vision Research Foundations, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
Department of Uvea and Medical Retina, Choithram Netralaya, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

* Corresponding author: Dr. Jyotirmay Biswas, Department of Uvea & Ocular Pathology, Medical and Vision Research Foundations, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. drjb@snmail.org

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Raghu K, Khan N, Biswas J. Current trends of biologic therapies in uveitis and scleritis. Ann Natl Acad Med Sci (India). doi: 10.25259/ANAMS_254_2025

Abstract

The management of non-infectious uveitis and scleritis continues to evolve. These conditions are often characterized by recurrent, uncontrolled inflammatory flare-ups that can progressively damage the eye’s structure and function in a “sawtooth” pattern, potentially leading to irreversible vision loss and even blindness. As such, treatment should aim to provide sustained control of inflammation while minimizing the long-term adverse effects of therapy. The success of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors in treating rheumatologic inflammatory diseases marked the beginning of a new “biologic era” in medicine. Biologic therapies are designed to target inflammation at the molecular level, offering effective immunomodulation with a relatively low risk of serious side effects. This article reviews the current understanding of biologic treatments for non-infectious uveitis and scleritis, highlighting recent pharmacological developments and clinical research findings.

Keywords

Biologics
Janus kinase inhibitors
Non-infectious uveitis
Scleritis
TNF-α inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Uveitis and scleritis encompass heterogeneous ocular inflammatory disorders that cause significant visual morbidity worldwide.1,2 Although topical and systemic corticosteroids are the first-line treatment, their long-term use can lead to complications such as cataracts, glaucoma, metabolic disturbances, and increased risk of infections.3 Conventional steroid-sparing immune modulatory therapies (methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate, and cyclosporine) are effective in many patients, but a substantial subset remains steroid-dependent, intolerant, or refractory. Managing ocular inflammatory disorders is complex and demands prompt, sustained treatment to minimize ocular complications and prevent vision loss. Despite the availability of multiple corticosteroid formulations and various systemic immunosuppressive drugs, achieving consistent, long-term control of intraocular inflammation remains difficult. Challenges such as resistance to standard therapies, medication side effects, and recurrent inflammation often hinder the effectiveness of conventional uveitis treatments. As a result, targeted biologic therapies have been developed to meet unmet clinical needs by blocking specific cytokines or immune cells responsible for ocular inflammation. These agents are used either as substitutes or in combination with existing immunomodulatory therapeutic agents.

Immunopathogenesis of uveitis and scleritis: Rationale for targeted biologics

It is crucial to understand the mechanisms underlying ocular inflammation for the selection of biologic agents. The inflammatory milieu in uveitis and scleritis is orchestrated by complex cytokine networks, prominently involving tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1 (IL-1), interleukin-17 (IL-17), and interleukin-23 (IL-23). The cytokines drive the recruitment and activation of immune cells, disrupt the integrity of the blood-ocular barrier, promote leukocyte infiltration, and culminate in tissue damage.4 Multiple immune cell subsets, including T helper (Th1 and Th17) cells, B cells, macrophages, and dendritic cells, participate in this inflammatory cascade. In several immune-mediated ocular diseases, such as Behçet’s disease and juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) associated uveitis, the Th17/IL-17/IL-23 axis plays a pivotal role, whereas B-cell activity, through autoantibody production and antigen presentation, is particularly relevant in vasculitis and systemic disease-associated uveitis.5,6

Comparatively, scleritis involves inflammation of the deeper scleral and vascular structures, often driven by immune complex deposition, complement activation, and collagen degradation.7 The therapeutic efficacy of agents targeting TNF-α, IL-6, and B cells in both uveitis and scleritis underscores the shared immunopathogenic pathways between these entities. Moreover, the unique ocular pharmacokinetic barriers, the blood-retina and blood-aqueous barriers, significantly influence drug bioavailability and treatment response.8 To overcome these limitations, novel strategies such as intravitreal or periocular biologic delivery, sustained-release implants, and localized formulations are being explored to achieve higher intraocular concentrations with reduced systemic exposure.9

MAJOR BIOLOGIC AGENTS

A biologic is a type of pharmaceutical drug produced using recombinant DNA technology. It is developed based on a detailed molecular understanding of how diseases develop and is used to treat non-infectious uveitis and other inflammatory conditions affecting the eye. Table 1 summarizes various biologics used in ophthalmology, their mechanism of action, dosage, route of administration, and potential adverse effects. Table 2 highlights the key clinical studies and evidence summary for biologic therapy in uveitis and scleritis.

Table 1: Major biologic agents in non-infectious uveitis and scleritis.
Biologic agent Target and mechanism Typical administration Predominant ocular indications Representative clinical evidence Key adverse events and safety considerations
Adalimumab Fully human monoclonal antibody that neutralizes TNF-α, preventing downstream inflammatory signaling. Subcutaneous 80 mg loading dose followed by 40 mg every 2 weeks. Intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis; Behçet-related uveitis; JIA-associated uveitis; refractory scleritis. VISUAL I–III (NEJM 2016); SYCAMORE (Lancet 2017). Local injection site discomfort, heightened infection risk, tuberculosis reactivation, and possible demyelinating complications.
Infliximab Chimeric monoclonal antibody binds soluble and membrane TNF-α. Intravenous 5-10 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2, 6, then every 4-8 weeks. Behçet’s uveitis, posterior or panuveitis, necrotizing or refractory scleritis. Multicenter Japanese Behçet cohort (Br J Ophthalmol 2019) and several case series. Infusion-related hypersensitivity, infection risk, and secondary antibody formation.
Golimumab/Certolizumab TNF-α inhibitors with differing molecular formats (fully human or PEG-fragmented). Golimumab 50 mg SC monthly/Certolizumab 400 mg SC every 4 weeks. Refractory NIU, HLA-B27 anterior uveitis. Limited real-world observational reports. Infection, cytopenia, and injection-related reactions.
Tocilizumab Blocks the interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R), thereby reducing cytokine-mediated vascular permeability and inflammation. Intravenous 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks or SC 162 mg weekly. Uveitic macular edema, JIA-associated uveitis, and recalcitrant scleritis. STOP-Uveitis (Ophthalmology 2017); APTITUDE (Lancet Rheumatol 2020). Elevated liver enzymes, hyperlipidemia, neutropenia, and infection.
Rituximab Depletes CD20-positive B cells, modulating antigen presentation and autoantibody production. Intravenous 1 g on days 1 and 15; retreatment every 6-12 months. Vasculitic uveitis, necrotizing or granulomatous scleritis, and Behçet’s disease. Multicenter cohort (Arthritis Rheumatol 2018). Infusion reactions, prolonged hypogammaglobulinemia, and infection risk.
Secukinumab Human monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-17A. 150-300 mg subcutaneously every month. HLA-B27–associated anterior uveitis, spondyloarthropathy-related ocular inflammation. Pooled phase III trials (Ophthalmology 2013) and subsequent case series (Front Ophthalmol 2025). Mild URTI, paradoxical ocular flares.
Anakinra/Canakinumab Interleukin-1 receptor blockade (Anakinra) or IL-1β neutralization (Canakinumab). SC 100 mg daily/150 mg monthly. Behçet’s uveitis and refractory NIU. Small open-label and case-based studies. Neutropenia, infection, and local irritation.
Sirolimus mTOR pathway inhibition suppresses T-cell proliferation. Intravitreal 440 µg every 2 months. Intermediate or posterior NIU; steroid-sparing in posterior segment disease. SAVE and SAKURA trials (Retina 2021). Transient ocular irritation, mild intraocular pressure elevation.
JAK inhibitors (e.g., Tofacitinib, Baricitinib) Inhibit JAK–STAT intracellular signaling, reducing multiple cytokine pathways. Oral 5 mg twice daily (Tofacitinib). Refractory JIA-related uveitis, severe scleritis. Small prospective series (Rheumatology 2022). Cytopenia, thromboembolic risk, and infection.

NIU: Non-infectious uveitis, HLA-B27: Human leukocyte antigen B27, STOP-Uveitis: Study of tocilizumab in patients with non-infectious uveitis, URTI: Upper respiratory tract infection, SC: Subcutaneous, mTOR: Mammalian target of rapamycin, JAK-STAT: Janus kinase signal transducer and activator of transcription.

Table 2: Key clinical studies and evidence summary for biologic therapy in uveitis and scleritis.
Biologic study (Year) Study design and population Primary outcomes Key findings Interpretation/clinical relevance
Adalimumab - VISUAL I (2016) Multicenter RCT, 217 patients with active noninfectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis. Time to treatment failure. Hazard ratio 0.50 vs placebo; median 24 weeks vs 13 weeks. Demonstrated significant disease control and steroid-sparing benefit; pivotal for global approval.
Adalimumab - VISUAL II (2016) Parallel RCT, 229 patients with inactive disease on steroids. Time to uveitic flare during steroid taper. 55% reduction in relapse risk vs placebo. Confirms value as maintenance therapy during corticosteroid reduction.
SYCAMORE (2017) Double-blind RCT, 90 children with JIA-associated uveitis. Composite treatment failure endpoint. Failure in 27% vs 60% with methotrexate alone. Established adalimumab as the standard of care for pediatric NIU.
STOP-Uveitis (2017) Open-label, multicenter study, 37 adults with refractory NIU. Change in AC cell grade and macular thickness. 43% achieved ≥2-step reduction; mean CRT decreased. Supported IL-6 blockade efficacy in macular edema.
APTITUDE (2020) Phase II study, JIA-uveitis unresponsive to anti-TNF. Reduction in anterior chamber cells. 56% achieved predefined improvement. Validates tocilizumab in anti-TNF-resistant disease.
Infliximab - Behçet (2019) Prospective multicenter cohort, 56 eyes. Change in vitreous haze and visual acuity. Rapid inflammation control; improved BCVA. Confirms infliximab as an alternative TNF blocker in Behçet disease.
Secukinumab - Pooled Trials (2013 + 2025 update) Combined RCTs and case series in HLA-B27 uveitis. Reduction in flare frequency. Mixed overall response; greatest benefit in anterior disease. Suggests selective role rather than first-line use.
Sirolimus - SAKURA (2021) Phase III, 347 eyes with NIU. ≥2-step reduction in AC cell grade. Comparable efficacy to systemic therapy with favorable safety. Validated local mTOR inhibition as a viable delivery approach.
Rituximab (2018) Multicenter series, autoimmune scleritis/vasculitis. Inflammation resolution at 12 months. 70-80% sustained control; steroid taper feasible. Supports B-cell depletion in refractory scleritis and vasculitis.
Tofacitinib (2022) Observational study, refractory uveitis and scleritis. Composite inflammatory activity score. Significant improvement within four weeks; tolerable profile. Early evidence of oral JAK inhibition as a potential adjunct; RCTs awaited.

RCT: Randomized control trial, JIA: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis, anti-TNF: Anti tumor necrosis factor, AC: Anterior chamber, CRT: Central retinal thickness, BCVA: Best corrected visual acuity.

ANTI-TNF-α AGENTS

Adalimumab

Adalimumab is a fully humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that selectively binds to soluble TNF-α, neutralizing its interaction with p55 and p75 surface receptors.10 It was the first biologic agent to receive U.S. FDA approval (Humira®, anti-TNF-α, AbbVie) in 2016 for the treatment of non-infectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitis.11 Clinical evidence from the VISUAL I and II, study phase III trials established its efficacy in both active and inactive Non-infectious uveitis (NIU). In these multicenter, double-masked, randomized studies, adalimumab demonstrated a 50% reduction in the risk of treatment failure compared to placebo, with significant improvement in visual acuity and reduced corticosteroid dependency. The VISUAL I and II trials demonstrated that adalimumab significantly delays treatment failure in active NIU and prevents flare in quiescent disease during corticosteroid tapering.12 The VISUAL III open-label extension further confirmed sustained disease quiescence and prolonged remission during long-term follow-up.13

Adalimumab is particularly effective in Behçet’s disease uveitis [Figures 1, 2a-b], JIA-associated uveitis, and HLA-B27-associated anterior uveitis [Figures 3a-b], where it reduces relapse rates.14,15 Its superior tolerability and fully humanized composition minimize the risk of antibody formation compared with chimeric agents.

Photograph of an oral aphthous ulcer in a 28-year-old male with Behcet’s disease and a history of recurrent oral and leg ulcers.
Figure 1:
Photograph of an oral aphthous ulcer in a 28-year-old male with Behcet’s disease and a history of recurrent oral and leg ulcers.
(a) Fundus photographs of a 28-year-old male with Behcet’s disease. Pre-treatment image showing active posterior uveitis. (b) Post-treatment image after eight biweekly subcutaneous injections of adalimumab along with oral immunosuppressant and oral steroid in tapering doses, demonstrating marked resolution of vitritis and vasculitis, with clear media and a restored macular reflex. Visual acuity improved from 6/60 to 6/9, and associated oral and leg ulcers healed completely.
Figure 2:
(a) Fundus photographs of a 28-year-old male with Behcet’s disease. Pre-treatment image showing active posterior uveitis. (b) Post-treatment image after eight biweekly subcutaneous injections of adalimumab along with oral immunosuppressant and oral steroid in tapering doses, demonstrating marked resolution of vitritis and vasculitis, with clear media and a restored macular reflex. Visual acuity improved from 6/60 to 6/9, and associated oral and leg ulcers healed completely.
(a) Anterior segment photographs of a 38-year-old female with HLA-B27-positive, reactive arthritis presenting with acute anterior uveitis in the right eye. Pre-treatment image (a) shows anterior chamber inflammation. (b) Post-treatment image demonstrates significant reduction in inflammation following the first subcutaneous dose of adalimumab, topical steroids, cycloplegics & oral steroids in tapering dose. The patient showed sustained improvement, and therapy was discontinued after 6 months.
Figure 3:
(a) Anterior segment photographs of a 38-year-old female with HLA-B27-positive, reactive arthritis presenting with acute anterior uveitis in the right eye. Pre-treatment image (a) shows anterior chamber inflammation. (b) Post-treatment image demonstrates significant reduction in inflammation following the first subcutaneous dose of adalimumab, topical steroids, cycloplegics & oral steroids in tapering dose. The patient showed sustained improvement, and therapy was discontinued after 6 months.

Common adverse effects include mild injection-site reactions and headache, while serious complications such as opportunistic infections, malignancy, and tuberculosis reactivation necessitate prior screening and periodic monitoring.16,17

Infliximab

Infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody composed of human constant and murine variable regions that binds both soluble and transmembrane TNF-α.18 It is administered intravenously and exhibits a rapid onset of action, making it particularly valuable in severe or sight-threatening uveitic flares.19 Infliximab has shown robust efficacy in Behçet’s disease-associated panuveitis, sarcoidosis-related posterior uveitis, and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome.20-23 In a multicenter retrospective study, 82% of patients with refractory NIU achieved clinical remission following infliximab therapy. Pediatric studies further demonstrated good tolerability at high doses (10-20 mg/kg) with rapid suppression of inflammation after the second infusion.24 Comparative analyses have revealed similar efficacy between infliximab and adalimumab, though infliximab may exert a more pronounced corticosteroid-sparing effect in some cohorts.19 The principal limitations include infusion reactions, immunogenicity with anti-drug antibody formation, and risk of delayed hypersensitivity. Concomitant use of methotrexate can reduce these immune responses.18

While intravenous infliximab remains the gold standard for systemic therapy, intravitreal formulations have also been explored in select refractory cases with favorable short-term safety profiles.20

Eternecept

Etanercept is a dimeric fusion protein composed of two extracellular domains of the human p75 TNF receptor linked to the Fc fragment of IgG1. It binds both TNF-α and TNF-β, thereby blocking receptor-mediated signaling.25

Although highly effective in systemic autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis, its role in uveitis remains controversial. Several reports have documented poor ocular efficacy and even paradoxical induction or exacerbation of uveitis during treatment.26,27

In randomized studies, etanercept failed to reduce uveitis relapse rates compared to placebo. The paradoxical inflammation is hypothesized to arise from its incomplete neutralization of membrane-bound TNF-α, and possible alterations in cytokine balance favoring Th17 activation. Thus, etanercept is not recommended as a first-line biologic in NIU and should be used cautiously or substituted with monoclonal antibodies when ocular involvement occurs.28,29

Golimumab

Golimumab is a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds both soluble and transmembrane TNF-α, with a longer half-life permitting monthly subcutaneous administration. Evidence supports its use in refractory cases of JIA-associated, HLA-B27-related, and Behçet’s disease-associated uveitis, particularly where previous anti-TNF therapy has failed. In a multicenter study of ankylosing spondylitis-associated uveitis, golimumab significantly reduced recurrence rates and ocular inflammation scores, with a favorable safety profile and minimal immunogenicity.30 Case series have further shown sustained remission and improved best-corrected visual acuity over 12 months.31

Reported adverse events are mild and include injection-site reactions, upper respiratory tract infections, and antinuclear antibody positivity. Its fully human structure minimizes allergic responses, making it an attractive option for long-term biologic therapy.32

Certolizumab

Certolizumab pegol is a PEGylated Fab’ fragment of a humanized anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody lacking the Fc portion, which decreases complement-mediated cytotoxicity and placental transfer.33 This unique structure makes it safer during pregnancy compared to other anti-TNF agents.34

Though large uveitis-specific trials are lacking, certolizumab has demonstrated promising results in rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease, and spondyloarthropathies, with extrapolated benefit in associated ocular inflammation.35

The C-VIEW trial showed significant reduction in acute anterior uveitis flares among patients with ankylosing spondylitis receiving certolizumab.36 Its tolerability profile is favorable, with minimal injection reactions and low immunogenicity. Ongoing studies are expected to elucidate its role in ocular disease and expand therapeutic indications.37

IL-6 pathway inhibitors

IL-6 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine implicated in the pathogenesis of several autoimmune and ocular inflammatory diseases, including uveitis. Tocilizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody targeting IL-6 receptor (IL-6R), has demonstrated significant efficacy in refractory cases of NIU. In the STOP-Uveitis randomized clinical trial, monthly intravenous infusions of tocilizumab at doses of 4 or 8 mg/kg resulted in marked improvement in central macular thickness and visual acuity with good tolerability.38

Tocilizumab has been increasingly reported for uveitic macular edema, refractory NIU, and scleritis. It may be particularly helpful when there is macular edema or when anti-TNFs are inadequate or poorly tolerated.39

Sarilumab, another IL-6R monoclonal antibody, has recently been evaluated in the SATURN phase II study, which showed improvement in macular edema and visual outcomes among NIU patients refractory to corticosteroids and immunomodulatory therapy.40

IL-1 and IL-1β inhibitors

Interleukin-1 and its subtype IL-1β are pivotal mediators of the inflammatory cascade in ocular diseases. Anakinra, a recombinant IL-1 receptor antagonist, competitively inhibits IL-1 binding and reduces cytokine-mediated inflammation. It has been used successfully in Behçet’s disease and cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes with associated uveitis refractory to TNF-α inhibitors.41 Clinical improvement has also been documented in chronic infantile neurological cutaneous articular (CINCA) syndrome-associated posterior uveitis.42

Canakinumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody specifically targeting IL-1β, has shown effectiveness in refractory Behçet’s disease-related uveitis, reducing retinal vasculitis and inflammatory recurrences. Case reports have also demonstrated remission in JIA-related uveitis with 150 mg subcutaneous dosing every 6 weeks.43

Gevokizumab, another IL-1β inhibitor, demonstrated rapid resolution of inflammation and decreased vitreous haze in small-scale studies; however, larger Phase III trials (EYEGUARD series) failed to achieve primary endpoints, despite secondary benefits like reduced macular edema and corticosteroid-sparing effect.44

IL-17 pathway inhibitors

IL-17A, produced by Th17 cells, contributes to ocular inflammation by inducing chemokines and enhancing neutrophil recruitment. Secukinumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody against IL-17A, initially showed promise in uveitis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome. However, phase III clinical trials (SHIELD, INSURE, and ENDURE) found no significant difference in uveitis recurrence compared with placebo.45 While secondary analyses suggested a corticosteroid-sparing effect, occasional paradoxical worsening of Behçet’s disease has been reported, warranting cautious use.46

IL-23 and IL-12 pathway inhibitors

Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the shared p40 subunit of IL-12 and IL-23, both critical for Th1 and Th17 differentiation. Elevated IL-23 levels have been identified in active Behçet’s and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada uveitis. Preliminary reports and ongoing clinical trials (STELABEC-1/2, USTEKINISU) suggest its potential in refractory NIU with acceptable safety.47,48

Other anti-IL-23 agents, including guselkumab and risankizumab, have shown efficacy in systemic inflammatory diseases such as psoriasis and Crohn’s disease, though ocular data remain limited. Rare paradoxical worsening of ocular inflammation has been observed in isolated cases, emphasizing the need for disease-specific trials.49

IL-2 pathway inhibitors

IL-2 signaling plays a central role in T-cell activation and proliferation. Daclizumab and basiliximab, both monoclonal antibodies directed against the IL-2 receptor α-chain (CD25), inhibit T-cell activation. Daclizumab demonstrated promising outcomes in long-term Phase I/II studies involving refractory birdshot retinochoroidopathy and JIA-associated uveitis. However, due to reports of inflammatory brain disorders and hepatic dysfunction, it was withdrawn globally in 2018.50,51 Basiliximab has shown occasional benefit in isolated refractory uveitis cases but lacks large-scale validation.52

B-cell and T-cell targeted therapies

Rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody against the CD20 antigen on B lymphocytes, induces selective B-cell depletion. It has shown efficacy in refractory cases of granulomatosis with polyangiitis-associated scleritis, retinal vasculitis, and JIA-related uveitis, with several case series reporting sustained remission up to 24 months.53,54 Comparative studies have indicated that rituximab achieves significant improvement in disease control compared with cyclophosphamide-based regimens, with fewer systemic toxicities. Common adverse events include infusion reactions, infections, and transient lymphopenia.

Abatacept, a CTLA-4-Ig fusion protein that modulates T-cell co-stimulation, has also been used in JIA-associated uveitis refractory to anti-TNF therapy. It blocks CD80/CD86-mediated T-cell activation, reducing the inflammatory cascade. Retrospective data support its utility in pediatric uveitis, though relapses may occur after withdrawal.55

JAK inhibitors

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are a newer class of small-molecule drugs that act by blocking the JAK-STAT signaling pathway, which mediates the effects of several pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-2, IL-6, IL-12, and interferon-γ. Since these cytokines are key drivers of ocular inflammation, JAK inhibitors offer a targeted and convenient oral alternative to biologic injections for the management of refractory noninfectious uveitis and scleritis. The most studied agent, tofacitinib, primarily inhibits JAK1 and JAK3 and has shown promising outcomes in early trials and case reports by reducing intraocular inflammation, improving visual acuity, and decreasing steroid dependence in patients unresponsive to conventional immunosuppressants or anti-TNF therapy.56,57

Second-generation agents such as upadacitinib (JAK1-selective) and baricitinib (JAK1/JAK2) are being explored for ocular inflammation, aiming for better efficacy and fewer systemic side effects.58 Their oral route, rapid onset, and broad cytokine blockade make them attractive options in the evolving biologic landscape. However, careful monitoring for infections, liver enzyme elevation, and thromboembolic risks is essential.59,60

Biologics for scleritis

Scleritis, especially necrotizing and vasculitic types, often reflects systemic autoimmune disease (e.g., granulomatosis with polyangiitis). Rituximab (anti-CD20) has strong real-world evidence and series supporting efficacy and steroid-sparing remission in ANCA-associated scleritis and refractory cases.61 Anti-TNF agents (infliximab, adalimumab) also show benefit in non-necrotizing scleritis in observational cohorts.

Biosimilars

Biosimilar formulations have markedly improved access to biologic therapy worldwide. Adalimumab and infliximab biosimilars demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety in maintaining remission and reducing corticosteroid dependence, with significant cost savings.62,63 Real-world data from India and Nepal confirm that biologic and biosimilar use is both feasible and effective in resource-limited settings, though logistical and financial barriers persist.64,65

EMERGING TRENDS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Localized and sustained delivery systems are also advancing. Intravitreal or periocular administration of biologic or biologic-like agents aims to enhance intraocular bioavailability while minimizing systemic toxicity. Investigational local IL-6 blockade (vamikibart) for uveitic macular edema represents one such approach, and innovations in implant technology are expected to allow longer dosing intervals and improved adherence.66

Economic and infrastructural factors profoundly influence biological use. In low- and middle-income countries, high drug costs, limited insurance coverage, and logistical hurdles surrounding infusion therapy restrict widespread adoption. Although cost-effectiveness data are limited, available evidence suggests that biologics offer meaningful steroid-sparing benefits. Biosimilar adoption mitigates some costs but requires clinician education and regulatory consistency. Currently, adalimumab remains the only biologic formally approved for noninfectious uveitis by most agencies, while others are used off-label.67 Optimal care depends on multidisciplinary collaboration among ophthalmologists, rheumatologists, and immunologists, emphasizing infection screening and patient education. In TB endemic settings, rigorous screening and prophylaxis are essential to minimize risk.68,69

Existing evidence for biologic therapy in ocular inflammation still carries limitations. Most studies are retrospective, single-center, or observational, and scleritis remains underrepresented. Follow-up durations are often insufficient to define long-term safety profiles. Heterogeneity in outcome definitions hampers meta-analysis, and biomarkers predictive of response are not yet validated. Consequently, treatment selection still relies heavily on clinician experience and iterative adjustment rather than standardized predictive models.70

Future research should prioritize large, multicenter randomized trials directly comparing biologic classes and exploring combination regimens with conventional immunosuppressants. Integration of multimodal imaging, molecular, and genetic biomarkers will advance personalized treatment. Novel delivery platforms, including intravitreal, suprachoroidal, and biodegradable sustained-release systems, may improve therapeutic precision while minimizing systemic exposure. Wider dissemination of affordable, high-quality biosimilars supported by robust regulation will be essential for global equity. International real-world registries tracking efficacy, safety, cost, and patient-reported outcomes should be prioritized to inform evidence-based guidelines.71

CONCLUSION

Biologic therapies have revolutionized the management of non-infectious uveitis and scleritis by offering targeted, mechanism-based interventions that transcend the limitations of corticosteroids and conventional immunosuppressants. By selectively modulating key cytokine and immune cell pathways, most notably TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1, and JAK-STAT, these agents provide sustained control of inflammation, prevent irreversible structural damage, and preserve vision in refractory disease. Moving forward, integrating biologics into standardized, multidisciplinary treatment algorithms supported by real-world data and biomarker-driven personalization will be pivotal in optimizing outcomes for patients with ocular inflammatory disease worldwide.

Authors’ contributions

KR: Design, literature search, manuscript preparation, manuscript editing and review, definition of intellectual content, concepts; NK: Concepts, manuscript editing and review, manuscript preparation; JB: Concept, design, manuscript review, manuscript editing, manuscript preparation.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that the patient’s names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

References

  1. , . Epidemiology and risk factors in non-infectious uveitis: A systematic review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:695904.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , , , et al. Visual morbidity and outcomes of scleritis associated with intraocular inflammation compared to isolated scleritis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2024;32:947-54.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Adverse ocular effects of systemic medications. Life (Basel). 2023;13:660.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Inflammatory cytokines as mediators of retinal endothelial barrier dysfunction in non-infectious uveitis. Clin Transl Immunology. 2023;12:e1479.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , et al. Upregulated IL-23 and IL-17 in Behçet patients with active uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:3058-64.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . The role of interleukin-17 in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: From pathogenesis to treatment. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022;58:1552.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , . Scleritis: Immunopathogenesis and molecular basis for therapy. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2013;35:44-62.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , . A review of ocular drug delivery platforms and drugs for infectious and noninfectious uveitis: The past, present, and future. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:1224.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , . Intraocular delivery considerations of ocular biologic products and key preclinical determinations. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2023;20:223-40.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. . Adalimumab: An anti-TNF agent for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2005;5:1491-504.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , . Adalimumab for noninfectious uveitis. Ophthalmol Retina. 2017;1:179-80.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , et al. Efficacy of adalimumab in non-infectious uveitis across different etiologies: A post Hoc analysis of the VISUAL I and VISUAL II trials. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2021;29:1569-75.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of adalimumab in patients with noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis. Ophthalmology. 2021;128:899-90.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. Adalimumab plus methotrexate for uveitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1637-46.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , et al. Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in Behçet’s disease-related uveitis: a multicenter retrospective observational study. Clin Rheumatol.. 2017;36:183-189.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jeong H, Baek SY, Kim SW. Adalimumab. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557889/
  17. , . Serious adverse events associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: Analysis of rare events. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:343-49.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , . A multicenter prospective study of infliximab therapy for refractory uveoretinitis associated with Behçet disease. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:824-31.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , , . Comparison of infliximab with adalimumab for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol. 2023;23:240.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , . Intravitreal infliximab in refractory uveitis in Behçet’s disease: a safety and efficacy clinical study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;154:534-541.e1.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , . Long-term efficacy of early infliximab-induced remission for refractory uveoretinitis associated with Behçet’s disease. Br J Ophthalmol.. 2021;105:1525-33.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , . Effect of infliximab on sight-threatening panuveitis in Behçet’s disease. Lancet. 2001;358:295-96.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , , et al. Anti-TNF-α therapy for refractory uveitis associated with Behçet’s Syndrome and sarcoidosis: A single center study of 131 patients. Ocul Immunol Inflamm.. 2022;30:223-30.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , , et al. The efficacy and safety of infliximab in refractory noninfectious uveitis: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:620340.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , , . Tumor necrosis factor antagonist mechanisms of action: A comprehensive review. Pharmacol Ther. 2008;117:244-79.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , et al. New onset of uveitis during anti-tumor necrosis factor treatment for rheumatic diseases. Semin Arthritis Rheum.. 2011;41:503-10.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , . Do tumor necrosis factor inhibitors cause uveitis? A registry-based study. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:3248-52.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , , et al. TNFα blockade in human diseases: Mechanisms and future directions. Clinical Immunology. 2008;126:121-36.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tessler HH.Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in the treatment of uveitis. American Academy of Ophthalmology Current Insight Series. 2006. Available from: https://www.aao.org/education/current-insight/tumor-necrosis-factor-tnf-inhibitors-in-treatment [Last accessed 2025 Oct 11].
  30. , , , , , , et al. Golimumab in refractory uveitis related to spondyloarthritis: multicenter study of 15 patients. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016;46:95-101.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , , et al. Efficacy of golimumab in patients with refractory non-infectious panuveitis. Sci Rep. 2024;14:2179.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , . The efficacy of golimumab against non-infectious uveitis: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2023;31:1013-2.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , , , , et al. Certolizumab pegol does not bind the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn): Consequences for FcRn-mediated in vitro transcytosis and ex vivo human placental transfer. J Reprod Immunol. 2016;116:7-12.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , , , et al. Pregnancy outcomes after exposure to certolizumab pegol: Updated results from a pharmacovigilance safety database. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70:1399-407.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , , , et al. Certolizumab pegol treatment in patients with axial-spondyloarthritis-associated acute anterior uveitis: A narrative review. Rheumatol Ther. 2022;9:1481-97.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , , , et al. Reduction of anterior uveitis flares in patients with axial spondyloarthritis on certolizumab pegol treatment: Final 2-year results from the multicenter phase IV c-VIEW study. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2021;13:1759720X211003803.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  37. , , , , , , et al. Long-term follow-up of certolizumab pegol in uveitis due to immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: Multicentre study of 80 patients. RMD Open. 2022;8:e002693.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , , , et al. Primary (Month-6) outcomes of the STOP-uveitis study: Evaluating the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of tocilizumab in patients with noninfectious uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;183:71-80.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. , , , , , , et al. Twenty-four month follow-up of tocilizumab therapy for refractory uveitis-related macular edema. Retina. 2018;38:1361-70.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. , , , , , , et al. Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab for the Treatment of Posterior Segment Noninfectious Uveitis (SATURN):: The Phase 2 study. Ophthalmology. 2019;126:428-437.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. , , . IL-1 pathways in inflammation and human diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6:232-41.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. , , , , . Hearing improvement in a patient with CINCA syndrome treated with the interleukin-1 receptor antagonist anakinra. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:1058-60.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. , , , , , , et al. Interleukin (IL)-1 inhibition with anakinra and canakinumab in Behçet’s disease–related uveitis: A multicenter retrospective observational study. Clin Rheumatol. 2017;36:191-97.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. , , , , , , et al. Update on the use of systemic biologic agents in the management of noninfectious uveitis. Biologics: Targets Therapy. 2014;8:13-29. (Discusses IL-1 blockade use, including case reports in uveitis)
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  45. , , , , , , et al. Efficacy of secukinumab in the treatment of noninfectious uveitis: analysis from phase III trials. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99:1157-63.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. , , , , , . Paradoxical Behçet’s disease activation following secukinumab therapy: A case report. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2022;30:1273-76.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. , , , , , , et al. Biologic drugs for the treatment of noninfectious uveitis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2024;69:473-92.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. ClinicalTrials.gov. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). Identifier NCT02911116, Ustekinumab (STELARA®) for active intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis or panuveitis. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02911116. [Last accessed 2025 Oct 11].
  49. , , , . Ustekinumab and newer interleukin inhibitors in ocular inflammatory diseases. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2023;63:1-10.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. , , , , , , et al. Treatment of noninfectious intermediate and posterior uveitis with the humanized anti–IL-2 receptor antibody daclizumab. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.. 1999;96:7462-66.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. , , , , , , et al. Adverse events with daclizumab therapy for uveitis: review and withdrawal rationale. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:1937-45.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  52. , , , . Efficacy of basiliximab in refractory pediatric uveitis: A case series. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2017;25:112-17.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. , , , , , , et al. Rituximab in refractory juvenile idiopathic arthritis–associated uveitis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016;68:694-99.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. , , , , , , et al. Rituximab in refractory ocular manifestations of systemic vasculitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74:385-90.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. , , , , , , et al. Abatacept for refractory juvenile idiopathic arthritis–associated uveitis: a multicenter cohort study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019;71:333-339.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. , , , , . Tofacitinib for refractory uveitis and scleritis. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2018;13:53-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  57. , , , , . Janus kinase inhibitors in noninfectious uveitis: A review and case series. Ophthalmol Ther. 2022;11:1113-22.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. , , , , . Effectiveness of Janus kinase inhibitors in the management of isolated noninfectious uveitis: a case series. Front Pharmacol. 2025;16:1509404.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  59. , , , , , . Efficacy and safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in noninfectious ocular inflammatory disease: A systematic review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024;11:1439338.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  60. , , , , . Review of Janus kinase inhibitors as therapies for inflammatory eye disease. J Ophthalmol. 2024;2024:9012345.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. , , . Rituximab in scleritis: A review of the literature. Eye (Lond). 2020;34:655-66.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. , , , , , , et al. The role of biosimilars in uveitis: long-term real-world experience and review of the literature. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:1468.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  63. , , . Budget impact analysis of including biosimilar adalimumab in formularies: potential cost savings and access implications. PharmacoEconomics Open. 2024;8:123-34.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. , , , . Rise of biologics in noninfectious uveitis: A retrospective cohort study from Nepal. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2023;85:1486-9.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  65. , , , , , , et al. Clinical efficacy of biosimilar switch of adalimumab for management of uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm.. 2024;32:442-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  66. ClinicalTrials.gov. A study to investigate vamikibart (RO7200220) in participants with uveitic macular edema (MEERKAT/SANDCAT). Identifier: NCT05642312/NCT05642325. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05642325. [Last accessed 2025 Oct 11].
  67. AbbVie Inc. HUMIRA (adalimumab) injection label. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Initial approval for non-infectious intermediate, posterior and panuveitis (adults) announced June 30, 2016; pediatric labeling updated subsequently. HUMIRA Prescribing Information. 2017. Available from: https://news.abbvie.com/2016-06-30-AbbVies-HUMIRA-adalimumab-receives-U-S-food-and-drug-administration-approval-to-treat-adults-with-non-infectious-intermediate-posterior-and-panuveitis [Last accessed 2025 Oct 11].
  68. , , . Minimizing tuberculosis risk in patients receiving anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy. J Infect. 2017;75:520-32.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. . WHO guidelines on latent tuberculosis infection: policy guidance to prevent tuberculosis in high-risk groups. Geneva: World Health Organization; . Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241548908 [Last accessed 2025 Oct 11].
  70. , , . Limitations of current evidence and the need for standardized outcome measures in uveitis trials: A critical review. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2021;29:743-52.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  71. , , , , , , et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Biosimilars in Pediatric Non-infectious Uveitis: Real-Life Data from the International AIDA Network Uveitis Registry. Ophthalmol Ther. 2024. ;13:761-74.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections