Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Article
Brief Report
Case Report
Commentary
Community Case Study
Editorial
Image
Images
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Mini Review
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Review Article
Reviewers; List
Short Communication
Task Force Report
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Article
Brief Report
Case Report
Commentary
Community Case Study
Editorial
Image
Images
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Mini Review
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Review Article
Reviewers; List
Short Communication
Task Force Report
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
62 (
1
); 48-53
doi:
10.25259/ANAMS_128_2025

Reflections of worth: Exploring self-esteem in caregivers of mentally ill individuals

Department of Mental health Nursing, Father Muller College of Nursing, Fr. Muller Road, Kankanady, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India

*Corresponding author: Prof. Santhipriya Monterio, Professor, Father Muller College of Nursing, Fr. Muller Road, Kankanady, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India. shntpriya3@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Zacharias R, Monterio S, Fernandes PV. Reflections of worth: Exploring self-esteem in caregivers of mentally ill individuals. Ann Natl Acad Med Sci (India). 2026;62:48-53. doi: 10.25259/ANAMS_128_2025

Abstract

Objectives

Family caregivers are invaluable partners of healthcare professionals in helping individuals suffering from mental ailments recover. Looking after mentally sick people, especially those who suffer from severe depression, bipolar affective disorder, and schizophrenia, is a challenging task for caregivers on a long-term basis, which impacts life quality. Certain intrinsic factors like psychological distress, care burden, self-esteem, and anxiety contribute to the quality of life. The study focused on the assessment of self-esteem of family caregivers of mentally ill clients.

Material and Methods

A descriptive design was used. Data were collected from 120 family caregivers of people suffering from mental illness using purposive sampling. Baseline proforma, as well as the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, were administered. Inferential and descriptive statistical methods, including the Chi-square test, were used for data analysis.

Results

The majority of caregivers had normal levels of self-esteem. No significant associations were observed between self-esteem levels and selected baseline variables.

Conclusion

Most caregivers exhibited normal self-esteem, but a notable proportion experienced low self-esteem, highlighting the psychological impact of caregiving. Interventions to enhance self-esteem and provide psychological support could benefit caregivers, improving their quality of life and caregiving ability.

Keywords

Caregivers
Mental illness
Self-esteem
Rosenberg self-esteem scale

INTRODUCTION

Self-esteem is an elementary aspect of psycho-social health, reflecting how individuals perceive their worth and value. It influences one’s confidence, motivation, and ability to cope with stress. According to Rosenberg, self-esteem refers to an individual’s favorable or unfavorable assessment of their own, shaped by experiences, social interactions, and achievements.1 High self-esteem is associated with better resilience and coping strategies, while low self-esteem leads to inadequacy, depressive feelings, and anxiety. Caregivers with low self-esteem may find it harder to seek support, manage stress, and maintain the quality of care they provide to their loved ones. Caregivers often bear a significant psychological and emotional burden, which can impact their mental well-being and self-esteem.2

Clinical and consulting psychologist Russell F Fuller lists the following as effects of low self-esteem: anxiousness, diminished stress threshold, loneliness, increased risk of depression, relationship issues, sexual dysfunction, poor performance in school and work, underachievement, and high rate of substance abuse.3 According to a survey, 1 in 8 people, or over 970 million people globally, suffer from a mental health issue. In 2017, 197 million people in India experienced mental health issues. Of them, 44.9 million suffered from anxiety, and 45.7 million had depression. It is anticipated that one member of every four families may experience a behavioral or mental health issue.4 According to National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences 2016 National Mental Health Survey, between 70% and 80% of Indians with mental illnesses did not receive treatment. Thus, 8% of the population suffered from mental illness. The prevalence of mental health issues is rising in Karnataka, along with the burden that falls on family members and caregivers.5

Research has shown that caregivers of mentally ill patients may experience increased stress, low social support, social isolation, financial strain, and stigma. These factors can lead to lower self-esteem, which in turn affects their ability to provide effective care.6-11 Our observation during professional life is that family members bear an increasingly heavy load. They deal with stress, money issues, and social stigma. Given the increasing recognition of the mental health challenges faced by caregivers, the study aimed to assess self-esteem levels of caregivers of mentally ill clients and explore the connection with self-esteem and characteristics such as age, education, and employment status. By identifying the factors that contribute to low self-esteem, the study seeks to provide insight into the development of support systems and interventions tailored to the needs of caregivers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross-sectional descriptive survey was employed to assess the level of self-esteem in caregivers. The study was carried out at Father Muller Medical College Hospital, Mangaluru. It is a multi-specialty hospital with a dedicated mental health center. The study population comprised family caregivers of mentally ill individuals who were either admitted to the psychiatry ward or visited the outpatient department. Caregivers were defined as family members who played a significant role in the daily care and support of the patient. A sample size of 120 caregivers was determined using the purposive method of sampling. The size of the sample was calculated based on a previous study,8 with a 95% confidence level and a 10% potential attrition rate. Inclusion criteria included: Age 18 years and above, having provided care for 6 months minimum, and living with and being actively involved in caring for individuals with mental illnesses. Caregivers with a history of any mental illness, non-family members providing care (e.g., professional caregivers), and caregivers with physical disabilities that could affect their ability to respond to the study tools were excluded. The study tool consisted of two parts: A baseline proforma and Rosenberg’s Self-esteem Scale. Baseline proforma comprised of clinical diagnosis, length of illness, number of prior psychiatric hospitalizations, age, gender, marital status, education, family type, employment, economic status, and relation to patient. The self-esteem scale of Rosenberg was utilized. The tool’s internal consistency was tested, and the reliability was found to be 0.88. It is a 10-item scale that assesses a person’s self-worth by considering negative and positive perceptions. It is a 4-point Likert scale, with responses ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree for all items. The scale ranges from 0 to 30. A score of 30 is the highest. The level of self-esteem was scored as follows: 0-14 is low, 15–25 is normal, and 26-30 is high.

The Institutional Ethical Committee issued ethical clearance (FMIEC/CCM/122/2023). The study was registered under the Clinical Trial Registry of India. (CTRI/2023/11/060156). All participants provided written informed consent, which ensured privacy and participation on their own. Subjects received assurances that their input would be kept anonymous while being utilized exclusively for the purpose of research. Data collected from April 3 to April 30, 2024. Permission from the institution authority was obtained before the data collection. The caregivers who met the inclusion criteria were selected, and tools were administered. Explanations of the research were given. Data were analyzed on SPSS software (version 22.0). Descriptive statistics, including frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation, were used to summarize demographic data and self-esteem level. Inferential statistics, specifically Fisher’s exact test and Chi-square test, were used for association with self-esteem levels and study attributes, considering a p-value of <0.05.

RESULTS

Table 1 includes data regarding relevant socio-demographic details of mentally ill individuals’ caregivers. The mean and SD age of participants were 44.6±15.2. About 60.8% of the subjects were married. More than half of them (55.8%) were males. 40.0% of them had higher secondary education, 81.3% belonged to a nuclear family, and 62.5% were unemployed. Moreover, 58.3% of the subjects were below the poverty line. The majority of the caregivers were parents (30%,) followed by children (26%), spouses (23.3%), and other relatives (10.0%).

Table 1: Socio-demographic profile of caregivers of mentally ill patients
(N=120)
Variables Frequency Percentage Mean ± SD
Age (years)
18-30 29 24.2
31-40 25 20.8
41-50 22 18.3 44.63±15.26
51-60 25 20.8
>60 19 15.8
Sex
Male 67 55.8
Female 53 44.2
Marital status
Married 73 60.8
Unmarried 40 33.3
Widow/Widower 4 3.3
Divorced/Separated 3 2.5
Education
Primary 27 21.7
Secondary 22 18.3
Higher secondary 48 40.0
Diploma & above 24 20.0
Type of family
Nuclear 98 81.7
Joint/Extended 22 18.3
Employment status
Unemployed 75 62.5
Govt. employed 3 2.5
Private employed 20 16.7
Self-employed 22 18.3
Economic status
APL 50 41.7
BPL 70 58.3
Relationship with patient
Parent 36 30
Spouse 28 23.3
Child 32 26.7
Sibling 12 10
Other relative 10 10

SD: Standard deviation, APL: Above poverty line, BPL: Below poverty line.

Table 2 includes the clinical variables of mentally ill patients. Nearly 29.2% of the mentally ill patients were diagnosed with mood disorder, delusional disorder (25.8%), schizoaffective disorder (20%), schizophrenia (15.8%), and unspecified non-organic psychosis (9.2%). Almost half (49.2%) were suffering from illness for less than 5 years, and about 29.2% for more than 10 years. Most (82.5%) of the mentally ill patients had no previous admission or had been admitted less than two times.

Table 2: Clinical profile of mentally ill patients
(N=120)
Variables Frequency Percentage
Clinical diagnosis
Schizophrenia 19 15.8
Mood disorder 35 29.2
Schizoaffective disorder 24 20
Delusional disorder 31 25.8
Unspecified non-organic
Psychosis 11 9.2
Duration of illness
<5yrs 59 49.2
5-10 yrs 26 21.7
>10 yrs 35 29.2
No. of previous psychiatric hospitalization
0-2 99 82.5
3-5 11 9.2
>5 10 8.3

Table 3 shows that the majority (74.2%) had normal, about 25.8% had low levels, and none of the study samples had high levels of self-esteem. The mean ± SD self-esteem of the caregivers of mentally ill patients was 15.79 ± 2.32, the median was 15, and the mean percentage was 52.3%. Table 4 details the connection between self-esteem with baseline characteristics. The median value of self-esteem obtained in the study was 15; it was used to assess association. Self-esteem did not significantly associate with baseline attributes such as sex, age, marital status, educational level, family type, employment status, relationship with patient, clinical diagnosis, duration of illness, number of previous hospitalizations, at a 0.05 significance level.

Table 3: Level of self-esteem among caregivers of mentally ill patients.
N=120
Level of self-esteem Scoring Frequency Percentage
High 26-30 0 0
Normal 15-25 89 74.2
Low 0-14 31 25.8

Maximum possible score=30

Table 4: Association between self-esteem and selected baseline variables
(N=120)
Variables Median <15 Median ≥ 15 Chi-square df p-value (Significance)
Age (in years)
18-30 6 23 2.81 4 0.58 (NS)
31-40 6 19
41-50 4 18
51-60 8 17
>60 7 12
Sex
Male 18 49 0.08 1 0.07 (NS)
Female 13 40
Marital status
Married 18 55 0.13 2 0.93 (NS)
Unmarried 11 29
Other 2 5
Education
Primary 7 19
Secondary 7 15
Higher secondary 11 37 0.65 3 0.88 (NS)
Diploma & above 6 18
Type of family
Nuclear 24 74 0.50 1 0.48 (NS)
Joint 7 15
Employment status
Unemployed 21 54
Govt. employed 1 2 0.49 2 0.78 (NS)
Private employed 4 16
Self-employed 5 17
Economic status
APL 12 38 0.15 1 0.69 (NS)
BPL 19 51
Relationship with the patient
Parent 8 28
Spouse 6 22 1.13 2 0.56 (NS)
Clinical diagnosis
Schizophrenia 3 16
Mood disorders 8 27
Schizoaffective 9 15 2.87 4 0.57 (NS)
Delusional 8 23
Unspecified non-organic 3
Psychosis
Duration of illness
<5years 18 41
5-10 years 7 19 2.06 2 0.35 (NS)
>10 years 6 29

P>0.05 Not Significant (NS), APL: Above poverty line, BPL: Below poverty line, df: degree of freedom.

DISCUSSION

Age distribution among caregivers for mentally ill patients in the current study was 44.6±15.2. Males made up 55.8% of the subjects. The percentage of married subjects was about 60.8%. Many (40%) had completed higher secondary education. Nearly 81.3% of the participants were members of nuclear families. Most (75%) were unemployed, and 70% were below the poverty line. Additionally, 30% were parents, 26% were children, and 23% were spouses. Of the subjects, nearly half (49.2%) had been suffering from illness for fewer than 5 years. Most of the subjects (82.5%) had no previous admission or had been admitted less than two times in a psychiatric institution in the past.

Whereas, in a similar study among caregivers of Indian schizophrenic patients, the majority were aged above 35. About half of the patients were males. Many were married and employed. About 52% were parents, and the majority of them belonged to nuclear families.12 However, in a related study, the majority of caregivers for mentally ill patients were between the ages of 32-38 years. Men comprised the majority of caregivers (61.9%). About 69% of the patients had a mental disorder for longer than five years. Approximately 44.3% of them had previously been hospitalized; 95.34% of them had fewer than or equivalent to five hospital stays. Lastly, 96% of the patients were on medication alone.13

In a study done in a psychiatry clinic at Jimma University Specialized Hospital in Ethiopia, 70.38% of the participants were men, and 67.77% of them were married. The caregivers’ average age was 37.8 (±13.9) years. Roughly 15.4% of people lacked literacy, while 30.09% had completed secondary school. Parents (25.12%) and other relatives (25.59%) made up the bulk of the caregivers, and most of them (81.04%) shared a home with the patients. Roughly 36.26% were farmers.14

A study conducted in China found that 53.3±13.5 was the average age of the caregivers, and 76% of them were married. The patient was diagnosed with depression (34.6%), Bipolar Affective Disorders (BPAD) (18.5%), and schizophrenia (46.8%). Moreover, 55% of the patients had previously been admitted to the hospital.15 The current study’s findings are in par with those of a related investigation conducted at Udupi taluk. Most caregivers (55.6%) were between the ages of 31-50. Nearly 38.4% of them were men, and the majority (80.9%) were married. Of these, around 33.4% possessed a university degree. Parents (20.3%) and spouses (30%) made up most of the caregivers. Of them, 41.6% earned more than 10,000 Indian rupees a month.8 The changes in the setting, cultural practices, and characteristics of caregivers might have led to changes in the findings.

Caregivers who take care of mentally ill people must have adequate self-esteem. It is important to deal with the frustration that comes from dealing with psychological conflicts and societal norms. The current study revealed that none had high self-esteem, while the majority of subjects (74.2%) had normal self-esteem and 25.8% had a low level of self-esteem. Results of the study were congruent with research at KMC Hospital in Manipal, where the majority of participants (68.3%) had normal self-esteem, followed by low self-esteem (30.2%) and high self-esteem (1.6%).16 The current study’s mean self-esteem of 15.98±2.86 is consistent with another study conducted at Central India Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences Chhattisgarh.10 The current study’s outcome defies that of earlier research of a similar nature conducted in Faridkot17 and South-West Nigeria,18 where most participants (64%) exhibited a low level of self-esteem. Findings state that it is crucial to take appropriate measures to enhance the self-esteem of the caregivers, as it ranges from normal to low, and very few had a high level of self-esteem.

In the current study, the research hypothesis was rejected because, at a 0.05 significance level, no association was found with self-esteem and baseline variables. The study findings were on par with a similar study done at Mangaluru, which stated no association with expressed emotions and characteristics at a 0.05 level of significance.19 In contrast, a study had an association with occupation and caregivers’ burden scores at a 0.05 level of significance.7 More studies employing a huge sample are required to support the finding.

Limitations of study

The study findings cannot be generally applicable as it was limited only to one setting, and a small sample size was used. The use of a self-reporting tool was subjected to recall bias and the possibility of misinterpretation of questions by the caregivers. Using a qualitative approach would have given better insight into the self-esteem than the quantitative approach used.

CONCLUSION

Because caring for individuals with mental illness involves additional obligations and demands a lot of their time, energy, and attention, caregivers’ quality of life is typically poor. High levels of stress are caused by this added obligation, and caregivers might not have the right coping skills. As per the American Psychological Association, experiencing strong self-worth is crucial for good emotional health and well-being. The study found that most of the caregivers had a normal level of self-esteem. More research and clinical trials are required in this field to achieve high self-esteem among the caregivers of mentally ill patients. Our study results provide a basis for planning and implementing needed interventions and policies for patients to promote the self-esteem of caregivers of mentally ill clients, thereby enhancing life quality.

Authors’ contributions

RZ: Data collection, manuscript writing; SM: Conceptualization, methodology, data analysis and interpretation, manuscript writing review and editing; PVF: Conceptualization, methodology.

Ethical approval

The research/study approved by the Institutional Review Board at Father Muller Institutional Ethics Committee, number FMIEC/CCM/122/2023, dated 13th March 2023.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)- assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that they have used artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for editing (e.g., refining text) of the manuscript.

REFERENCES

  1. . Introduction to the psychology of self-esteem. Self-esteem: Perspectives, influences, and improvement strategies (1st ed). Nova Science Publisher; . p. :1-23.
  2. . Self-esteem inventory (Coopersmith) In: Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. Springer International Publishing; . p. :4760-3.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . The social importance of self-esteem. Berkeley: University of California Press; . http://ark.cdlib.org/ark:/13030/ft6c6006v5/ [Last accessed 2025 Apr 21]
  4. . The burden of mental disorders across the states of India: The global burden of disease study 1990-2017. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:148-61.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  5. TNN/Oct 24, 2016, 23:42 IST. 8% of people in Karnataka have mental illness: National Mental Health Survey. Times of India. Available from: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bengaluru/8-of-people-in-karnataka-have-mental-illness-national-mental-health-survey/articleshow/55038834.cms [Last accessed 2025 Apr 26].
  6. . A descriptive co-relational study on burden, social support and family wellbeing among caregivers of mentally ill patients in mansik aarogayashala, Gwalior (M.P.) Asia Jour Nurs Educ and Rese. 2017;7:228.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. , . Assess burden, social support and family wellbeing among caregivers of mentally ill patients at Institute of mental health, Erragadda, Hyderadbad and Andra Pradesh. Asian J Nur Edu Research. 2011;1:64-7.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Caregiver burden among caregivers of mentally ill individuals and their coping mechanisms. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2018;9:180-5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , . Stigma and its correlates among caregivers of patients with bipolar disorder. Indian J Psychol Med. 2019;41:455-61.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , . Perceived social support and self-esteem among caregivers of patients with schizophrenia and normal control. JCHM. 2023;10:69-74.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. , . Family burden and self-esteem among relatives of substance abusers. Ind J Res [Internet]. 2021;10:183-4.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , . Changes in psychosocial variables among caregivers of patients with schizophrenia: A short-term follow-up study. Cureus. 2024;16:e55887.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  13. , . Burden of care among caregivers of mentally ill patients. JPPCM. 2022;7:52-8.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , . Self-stigma among caregivers of people with mental illness: Toward caregivers&rsquo; empowerment. JMDH 2014:37.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , et al. Quality of life and care burden among family caregivers of people with severe mental illness: Mediating effects of self-esteem and psychological distress. BMC Psychiatry. 2022;22:672.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central] [Google Scholar]
  16. , . A correlative study to assess the psychological wellbeing and self-esteem among adult children of mentally ill parent/s in selected hospital of Udupi district. Journal of health and allied sciences nu. 2014;4:053-6.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. , . Assertiveness and self-esteem in Indian adolescents. Galore Int J Health Sci Res. 2017;2 doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26332.13448
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , . Determinants of state of mental health among caregivers of children with disabilities. Int J Ment Health Promot. 2023;25:721-34.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , . Quality of life and expressed emotion in caregivers of patients with psychiatric disorders. J Health Allied Sci NU. 2024;14:243-7.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections