Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Article
Brief Report
Case Report
Commentary
Community Case Study
Editorial
Image
Images
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Mini Review
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Review Article
Reviewers; List
Short Communication
Task Force Report
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Article
Brief Report
Case Report
Commentary
Community Case Study
Editorial
Image
Images
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Mini Review
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Review Article
Reviewers; List
Short Communication
Task Force Report
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Perspective
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/ANAMS_117_2025

Rosettes in dermatology: A polarized perspective on diagnosis and clinical significance

Department of Dermatology, Civil Hospital, Nabha, Punjab, India

* Corresponding author: Dr. Sharang Gupta Department of Dermatology, Civil Hospital, Nabha, Punjab, India. drsharanggupta97@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Gupta S. Rosettes in dermatology: A polarized perspective on diagnosis and clinical significance. Ann Natl Acad Med Sci (India). doi: 10.25259/ANAMS_117_2025

Dermoscopy has revolutionized dermatological diagnostics by enabling the visualization of subsurface skin structures. Among various dermoscopic features, rosettes have gained attention due to their distinctive appearance and diagnostic implications.1 Figure 1 illustrates the characteristic appearance of rosettes, as seen in polarized light dermoscopy. This review summarizes existing literature on rosettes in dermatology, highlighting their broader clinical relevance across disease categories and comparing findings with earlier fragmented reports. While prior mentions of rosettes have appeared in case series and reviews focused on actinic keratoses, this review compiles evidence across neoplastic, inflammatory, infectious, and vascular conditions, offering a more comprehensive, structured overview. Recognizing the spectrum of conditions associated with rosettes is crucial for accurate diagnosis and management. The emergence of polarized dermoscopy has facilitated the detection of these structures, which remain invisible under non-polarized light.2 This review synthesizes existing literature on rosettes in dermatology, highlighting their clinical relevance and differential diagnosis.

Diagrammatic representation of rosettes as seen on dermoscopy as four bright white dots or globules grouped like a four-leaf clover.
Figure 1:
Diagrammatic representation of rosettes as seen on dermoscopy as four bright white dots or globules grouped like a four-leaf clover.

Methodology

A systematic literature search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.3 The search was performed in December 2024 across MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science. Keywords used included “rosettes,” “dermoscopy,” “polarized light,” “cutaneous neoplasms,” and “inflammatory skin diseases.” Studies published in English, reporting rosettes in various dermatological conditions, were included, while reviews, editorials, and non-English articles were excluded. Both observational and case-control studies were considered. Reference lists of relevant studies were manually searched for additional articles.

The search yielded 73 articles meeting the inclusion criteria, identifying 47 distinct diagnoses associated with rosettes. These conditions were categorized as neoplastic, inflammatory, infectious, and vascular.

Neoplastic conditions

Keratinizing neoplasms, such as actinic keratosis (AK) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), were most frequently reported, 19 of the 73 articles (26%) documenting rosettes in these lesions.4 Histopathologically, rosettes in these conditions correlate with corneal lamellae and areas of significant keratinization.5 Their presence can aid in distinguishing AK and SCC from other non-pigmented lesions, supporting early detection and timely intervention.

Additionally, rosettes have been noted in basal cell carcinoma and melanoma, albeit less frequently. In amelanotic melanoma, rosettes may serve as an early clue, assisting in differentiation from other non-pigmented malignancies.6

Inflammatory conditions

Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) was the most frequently reported inflammatory condition associated with rosettes, appearing alongside markers such as follicular plugs and telangiectasias.7 Their presence may help differentiate DLE from other chronic inflammatory dermatoses.

Rosettes have also been observed in plaque psoriasis, where they manifest as a generalized pattern rather than a focal finding.8 This feature may aid in distinguishing psoriasis from other erythematous scaly conditions like eczema and pityriasis rubra pilaris, guiding appropriate management strategies.

Infectious conditions

Molluscum contagiosum was the most reported infectious condition associated with rosettes, with three articles documenting their presence.9 The proposed mechanism involves keratinized debris within dilated follicles interacting with polarized light.

Rosettes have also been described in leishmaniasis and deep fungal infections, where they likely arise due to fibrotic changes and keratin deposition.10 Recognizing this pattern may assist clinicians in suspecting these infections and confirming the diagnosis with appropriate investigations such as histopathology, special stains, culture, or polymerase chain reaction.

Vascular conditions

Acroangiodermatitis was the sole vascular condition identified, with one article reporting rosettes in this context.11 Although their presence in vascular conditions remains poorly understood, fibrosis and structural dermal changes may contribute to their formation.

Histopathological correlation

The exact histopathological basis of rosettes remains a subject of investigation. One prevailing hypothesis suggests that they result from polarized light interacting with keratin-filled adnexal openings or perifollicular fibrosis.12 Histological examination frequently reveals compact orthokeratosis or parakeratosis with keratin-filled follicular infundibula as a potential structural basis.13 Table 1 demonstrates histopathological correlates of rosettes across disease categories. Further studies integrating high-resolution histological and dermoscopic correlation are needed to clarify these findings.

Table 1: Histopathological correlates of rosettes across disease categories.
Disease category Representative conditions Proposed histological basis
Neoplastic AK, SCC, BCC Orthokeratosis, corneal lamellae, and follicular keratin
Inflammatory DLE, Psoriasis Follicular plugging, dermal fibrosis
Infectious Molluscum contagiosum, Leishmaniasis Keratinized debris in follicles, perifollicular fibrosis
Vascular Acroangiodermatitis Dermal sclerosis/fibrosis

AK: Actinic keratosis, SCC: Squamous cell carcinoma, BCC: Basal cell carcinoma, DLE: Discoid lupus erythematosus.

Clinical utility and future directions

While the presence of rosettes in various dermatological conditions has been previously documented, the exact clinical implications remain underexplored. Recognizing rosettes can assist in narrowing differential diagnoses and guiding biopsy decisions. For instance, their presence in AK and SCC supports these diagnoses, while their identification in inflammatory or infectious conditions like DLE or molluscum contagiosum provides additional diagnostic clues.14

While traditionally associated with actinic damage, rosettes have been reported in pediatric cases, particularly in congenital nevi, suggesting a broader clinical significance.15

Polarized light dermoscopy is essential for detecting rosettes, as their absence under non-polarized settings underscores their optical nature.16 The degree of polarization may influence visibility and clarity, warranting further research.

In conclusion, rosettes under dermoscopy are observed in a broad spectrum of dermatological conditions beyond keratinocytic neoplasms. Awareness of their diverse presentations can enhance diagnostic accuracy and inform clinical management. However, further studies are necessary to clarify their prognostic significance and potential implications in disease progression.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent not required as there are no patients in this study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

References

  1. , , , . Frequency and clinical significance of rosettes in dermoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72:89-95.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Dermatoscopy in routine practice: ‘Chaos and Clues’. Aust Fam Physician.. 2012;41:482-87.
    [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , . PRISMA Statement. updated guidelines for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2011;22:128.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , . Rosettes in actinic keratosis and squamous cell carcinoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32:48-52.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , et al. Rosettes and white shiny structures in polarized dermoscopy: histological correlation. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2016;30:311-313.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , , et al. Dermoscopy of amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma. Br J Dermatol. 2007;156:512-14.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. Dermoscopic criteria of discoid lupus erythematosus. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol.. 2013;27(2):362-369.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . Dermoscopy in dermatologic infections and infestations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;75:62-77.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , . Dermoscopic findings in molluscum contagiosum. Arch Dermatol.. 2007;143:468-72.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , . Dermoscopy of leishmaniasis: A systematic review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32:764-71.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , . Dermoscopy in vascular dermatology: An up-to-date overview. Dermatol Ther. 2020;10:27-41.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , , et al. Polarized dermoscopy: A review of its applications in dermatology. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2019;110:359-68.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , et al. The significance of rosettes in polarized dermoscopy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32:e98-e100.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , , , , et al. Rosettes in dermoscopy: Histopathological correlation and clinical implications. Int J Dermatol. 2019;58:1278-83.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , , et al. Dermoscopy for the pediatric population: A review of applications and benefits. Pediatr Dermatol. 2020;37:204-12.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , et al. Optical properties of skin structures influencing dermoscopic features. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137:912-18.
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections