Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Article
Brief Report
Case Report
Commentary
Community Case Study
Editorial
Image
Images
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Mini Review
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Review Article
Reviewers; List
Short Communication
Task Force Report
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Article
Brief Report
Case Report
Commentary
Community Case Study
Editorial
Image
Images
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Mini Review
Obituary
Original Article
Perspective
Review Article
Reviewers; List
Short Communication
Task Force Report
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
55 (
3
); 119-123
doi:
10.1055/s-0039-1698494

Cutaneous Anthrax—Still a Reality in India

Department of Dermatology, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Mawdiangdiang, Shillong, Meghalaya, India

Address for correspondence Devinder Mohan Thappa, MD, DHA, FRCP, FAMS, FIMSA, North Eastern Indira Gandhi Regional Institute of Health and Medical Sciences, Mawdiangdiang, Shillong 793018, Meghalaya, India (e-mail: dmthappa@gmail.com).

Licence
This open access article is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Anthrax, a toxigenic zoonosis, incidentally affecting humans has become rare but endemic outbreaks still continue to occur in tropical countries like India, parts of South America, and Europe where veterinary control of livestock is marginal and environmental conditions favor an animal–soil–animal cycle. India, with its largest population of livestock in the world, continues to have anthrax outbreaks with highest incidence reported from south, and the authors have reported an outbreak of 23 cases from 1998 to 2001 from south India. Children outnumbered adults and most of them had lesions on the exposed sites. However, there is a limited documentation of anthrax outbreaks from India warranting the need for sensitizing and creating awareness among health care professionals to identify and report these cases at the earliest so that appropriate actions are taken. Anthrax continues to retain a certain fascination and notoriety because of the potential for use of the bacillus spores in biologic warfare.

Keywords

chemical extract of anthrax
Bacillus anthracis
inhalational anthrax
bioterrorism
injectional

Introduction

Anthrax occupies an important place in the history of infectious diseases, as it is the first human disease to be attributed to a specific pathogen.1,2 It is a zoonotic infection with Bacillus anthracis. The name anthrax comes from a Greek word for “coal,” a reference to black eschar that is eventually formed in cutaneous anthrax.

Human anthrax is of four clinical forms depending on the route of transmission: cutaneous (the most common form accounting for nearly 95% of all anthrax cases), inhalational, ingestion form, and injectional form.3

History

In 1876, Robert Koch (1843–1910) reproducibly transmitted anthrax to mice by inoculating them with blood from the cattle and subsequently, he then recovered the same rod-like bacteria from the sick mice as came from the cattle. He could pass the disease from one mouse to another by inoculating them with these pathogens. Based on his experiments, he proposed the “Henle–Koch postulates” for proof that a microorganism was the cause of an infectious disease.4

Robert Koch's landmark work on anthrax helped to establish the germ theory of disease, and an 1877 report on B. anthracis included the first published photomicrographs of any bacteria.3

B. anthracis is a large (1–5 micron), spore forming aerobic, or facultative anaerobic gram-positive rod, usually arranged in a box-car pattern.1,5 When cultured on 5% sheep blood agar, 2 to 5 mm colonies have ground glass appearance with nonhemolytic, tenacious colonies (beaten egg-white appearance) after 15 to 24 hours. On India-ink staining, poly-D glutamic acid capsule can be visualized. On methylene blue staining, the bacterial cell is stained blue, whereas the surrounding capsule is pink. This is described as the M’Fadyean's reaction. Koch's postulates were proved on this organism for the first time.5

Epidemiology

Being a zoonotic infection anthrax is mainly linked to goat, sheep, cattle, antelope, kudu, pigs, horses, zebu, and other animals.6 Animals are infected by ingesting the spores from contaminated soil, feed, or even meat (in case of wild animals). It is transmitted to humans by meat, wool, hides, bones, and hairs and rarely from person to person.

Infection in animals commonly occurs due to ingestion of spores or inoculation into abraded perioral areas while grazing in contaminated area or eating contaminated feed or meat. Subsequent death of the animal causes recontamination of the environment.6,7 After such multiple events, the area might become endemic. Other modes of spread in animals are fomites, by insects or legs of vultures.6,7

Anthrax should be considered as possible cause of death in herbivorous animals that have died suddenly and unexpectedly, especially if hemorrhage from the nose, mouth, or anus has occurred.3 Failure of the blood to clot, the absence of rigor mortis, and the presence of splenomegaly are the most significant necropsy findings in such animals.6,7

The disease has a global distribution but incidence in livestock and humans varies with local ecology, implementation of control strategies, and sociocultural practices that determine spillover from animals to humans. Although most developed countries report few sporadic cases in livestock and humans, the disease is still enzootic in parts of Africa (e.g., Zimbabwe and Chad), the Middle East, Central Asia, China, Pakistan, Bhutan, Bangladesh, and India.1,2,6-15

The geographic distribution of anthrax is associated with certain ecological factors. In some ecosystems, outbreaks occur late in the hot–dry season, whereas in others, outbreaks are associated with the end of heavy rains, suggesting that weather extremes may be an important trigger of outbreaks.6

One of the largest outbreaks of anthrax occurred in Zimbabwe during 1979 to 1985 where approximately 10,000 cases of cutaneous anthrax were reported. Inhalational anthrax historically referred as “wool-sorters” disease because it occurred in industrial settings where spore contaminated wool or animal hides are handled.5,16

Anthrax is also mentioned prominently as potential agent of biowarfare and bioterrorism. In the 1950s and 1960s, both the United States and former Soviet Union developed anthrax as a biological weapon, as have other countries.5

An epidemic of inhalation anthrax occurred among persons living in Sverdlovsk, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, in April and May 1979 resulting in at least 96 cases and 66 deaths.17-19 This outbreak also affected cattle within the city. It was concluded that this largest outbreak of human inhalation anthrax was due to an infectious aerosol emanating from the military facility. This outbreak raised considerable concern among scientists and policymakers about the potential for the use of aerosolized B. anthracis spores as an agent of biological terrorism. Indeed, these fears were confirmed in 2001 when an outbreak of 22 cases of anthrax (11 inhalational and 11 cutaneous) occurred in the United States from intentional contamination of the U.S. mail delivered to several persons by the U.S. Postal Service. Five deaths and 22 cases of anthrax occurred.17-19

Since 2009, anthrax has emerged among heroin users in Europe, presenting a novel clinical manifestation, “injectional anthrax,” which has been attributed to contaminated heroin distributed throughout Europe; before 2009, only one case was reported.20,21 During 2012 and 2013, new cases of injectional anthrax were diagnosed in Denmark, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Overall 70 confirmed cases were reported, with 26 fatalities (37% case fatality rate). The latest two confirmed cases occurred in March 2013.20,21

Anthrax in India

A few sporadic cases and endemic outbreaks have been reported from India.1,2 During the last two decades, 70 cases of human anthrax were encountered at the Christian Medical College at Vellore in Tamil Nadu of which 26 cases had cutaneous anthrax. A review of Indian literature in 1996 found 112 cases of anthrax (71 cutaneous anthrax cases) in places, other than Vellore. The authors have recorded 23 cases of cutaneous anthrax over a period of 3 years with a single mortality due to septicaemia.1,2 Recently, outbreaks of cutaneous anthrax have been recorded from Andhra Pradesh (in the year 2005, 2009, and 2012), and West Bengal (2009).22-25 These data confirm the endemicity of anthrax, besides in the state of West Bengal, in other three southern states of India, that is, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu.

Life Cycle of Bacillus anthracis

Table 1 depicts the life cycle of B. anthracis.1,20,21

Table 1 Cycle of Bacillus anthracis
Soil cycle Anhrax spores in soil/vegetation Multiplications (soil contamination) spread to the herbivorous animals
Animal cycle (primarily herbivorous) Animal anthrax The infected animals die and contaminate the soil and other water resources
Human cycle Direct contact with the animals Clinical anthrax (cutaneous, pharyngeal, and intestinal)
Indirect contact with the contaminated animal products, such as hair, hides, bones (Industrial contact) Clinical anthrax (cutaneous, inhalation)
Insect cycle Insects play role in the transmission of B. anthracis to humans (cutaneous anthrax) and domestic animals
Injection cycle Contaminated heroin injections in Europe (due to use of animal skin for smuggling)

Pathogenesis

Cutaneous inoculation occurs at the site of minor trauma, insect bite or preexisting skin lesions whereas inhalational (pulmonary or Woolsorter's disease) and intestinal forms result from inhalation or ingestion of spores.1,3,5

Major virulence factors in B. anthracis known for inflammatory response with hemorrhage and necrosis and gelatinous edema in the tissue are as follows:

  1. Edema factor (EF).

  2. Lethal factor (LF).

  3. Antiphagocytic poly-D glutamic acid capsule.

EF and LF bind with protective antigen (PA) to form EF-PA binary toxin and LF-PA binary toxin. EF causes water and calcium dysregulation resulting into characteristic edema of anthrax. It also impairs function of polymorphonuclear leucocytes. LF interferes with normal T-cell function causing excessive production of cytokines and dysregulation of cytokine network leading to cytokine storm resulting in multiorgan failure, shock, and death. It is also responsible for bleeding diathesis.1,3,5

Clinical Features

The lesion of cutaneous anthrax follows the introduction of endospores into the skin. Common sites involved are exposed parts of the body.1,3,5,8,10 All ages and both genders may be affected. In rural settings, children minding cattle may be affected.26-33 Generally, cutaneous anthrax presents with single lesion but they may be multiple. Fatalities in cutaneous anthrax are mainly due to obstruction of the airways by the edema that accompanies lesions that form on the face or neck but can also occur when cutaneous disease progresses to systemic infection.3

Clinical features of various types of anthrax are tabulated in the Table 2.1,3,5,20,21

Table 2 Clinical types, diagnostic features, and prognosis of anthrax
Type Source of infection Incubation period Clinical features Laboratory diagnosis Prognosis
Cutaneous anthrax 1. Inoculation into abraded skin during skinning and butchering of infected animals
2. Insect bites
1–12 days The initial skin lesion is papule develops into vesicle which rupture to produce necrotic ulcer surrounded by smaller peripheral vesicles
Later central black eschar form and heal with scarring in 1–2 weeks
Distinctive features are as follows:
1. Lesion is painless
2. Edema out of proportion
3. Lack of neutrophilic response
4. Regional lymphadenopathy
Smear from edge of eschar or vesicular fluid for
•Gram stain
•PCR
Skin biopsy (full thickness punch biopsy from papule, vesicle, or eschar).
Blood culture Serodiagnosis (when culture fails owing to the previous treatment)Guinea pig or mouse inoculation
Sepsis is rare and mortality is less than 1% with adequate antibiotic therapy
Inhalational anthrax 1. Contaminated wools and hides
2. Bioterrorism
2–43 days Flu like symptoms and nonproductive cough followed by respiratory distress and respiratory failure Chest radiograph/CT scan: mediastinal widening due to hemorrhagic lymphadenopathy, hemorrhagic pleural effusion, infiltrate or consolidation
Blood culture
Serodiagnosis
Gastro-intestinal anthrax 1. Consumption of raw or under-cooked meat 2–144 hours Oropharyngeal: severe sore-throat, swelling of neck, regional lymphadenopathy, dyspnea and fever
Intestinal: present with hemorrhagic gastro-enteritis which may lead to obstruction, or perforation. It is due to hemorrhagic ulceration which appear in mucosa of terminal ileum or cecum
Gram staining in infected fluids or blood
Blood culture
Serodiagnosis
Guinea pigs or mouse inoculation
Case fatality is very high
Injection anthrax Contaminated heroin injections due to use of animal skin for smuggling Serious soft tissue infection with significant edema Tissue biopsy
Blood culture
Serodiagnosis
Progression to septic shock can be rapid
Anthrax meningo-encephalitis Usually associated with inhalational and GI anthrax, rarely with cutaneous •Cerebral edema
•Parenchymal brain hemorrhage
•Vasculitis
•Subarachnoid hemorrhage
CSF and blood culture
Gram staining
Nearly always fatal

Abbreviations: CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CT, computed tomography; GI, gastrointestinal; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

Differential Diagnosis

Cutaneous anthrax needs to be differentiated from vaccinia, Milker's nodule, orf (ecthyma contagiosum), and furuncle. Painless eschar, with profound edema and lack of neutrophilic response gives clue to the diagnosis of cutaneous anthrax supplemented by Gram's stained smear and culture of the B. anthracis.1,3,5 The anthraxin skin test, consisting of subdermal injection of a commercially produced chemical extract of an attenuated strain of B. anthracis, is now available for the diagnosis of acute and previous cases of anthrax.1

Treatment

The most commonly used antibiotics are mentioned below:

  • Ciprofloxacin.

  • Erythromycin.

  • Tetracycline/doxycycline.

  • Chloramphenicol.

In case of extensive edema, meningitis, or swelling in the head and neck region, corticosteroid may be given. One or more additional antimicrobials (rifampicin, vancomycin, ampicillin, imipenem, clindamycin, or clarithromycin) are required in cases of inhalational or gastrointestinal anthrax.1,3,5,32,33

The treatment may be modified in the light of drug sensitivity pattern, once these are available. Surgical interventions are not beneficial as it can exacerbate the injury.

Two types of anthrax toxin antibodies, anthrax immune globulin and humanized monoclonal antibody can be given as adjunctive therapy.5

Prevention

  1. Control of animal anthrax.5,32,33

  2. Use of proper sterilization techniques in industrial settings dealing with animal products like hides and wools.

  3. Immunization in high-risk population with anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA).

  4. In suspected event of bioterrorism event, exposed individuals should take preexposure prophylaxis consisting of 60 days of antibiotic (ciprofloxacin or doxycycline) with or without AVA.5,32,33

Note

The author was selected for Dr. R.V. Rajam Oration for the year 2018–2019.

Conflict of Interest

None declared.

References

  1. , . Anthrax: an overview within the Indian subcontinent. Int J Dermatol. 2001;40(03):216-222.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , . Cutaneous anthrax: an endemic outbreak in south India. J Trop Pediatr. 2002;48(04):225-226.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Bacillus and other endospore forming bacteria. In: , , , eds. American Society for Microbiology. eds. Manual of Clinical Microbiology (11th). Washington, DC: ASM Press; . p. :441-461.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. , . Early history of infectious disease: epidemiology and control of infectious diseases. In: , , eds. Infectious Disease Epidemiology: Theory and Practice (2nd). Boston, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; . p. :3-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. . Anthrax. In: , , eds. Goldman's Cecil Medicine Vol 2012. (24th). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; p. :1837.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , . Recurrent anthrax outbreaks in humans, livestock, and wildlife in the same locality, Kenya, 2014–2017. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018;99(04):833-839.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , . Anthrax outbreaks in the humans-livestock and wildlife interface areas of Northern Tanzania: a retrospective record review 2006-2016. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(01):106.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . Evaluation of clinical and serological findings for diagnosis of cutaneous anthrax infection after an outbreak. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2017;36(03):289-293.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , . Epidemiology of human anthrax in China, 1955–2014. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23(01):14-21.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , . Cutaneous anthrax: evaluation of 28 cases in the Eastern Anatolian region of Turkey. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2016;35(03):177-180.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , . , . . Investigation and control of anthrax outbreak at the human-animal interface, Bhutan, 2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(09):1524-1526.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , . Human cutaneous anthrax, Georgia 2010-2012. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20(02):261-264.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , . Recent outbreak of cutaneous anthrax in Bangladesh: clinico-demographic profile and treatment outcome of cases attended at Rajshahi Medical College Hospital. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:464.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , . Anthrax outbreaks in Bangladesh, 2009-2010. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012;86(04):703-710.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , . Anthrax Epizootic in Wildlife, Bwabwata National Park, Namibia, 2017. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25(05):947-950.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. . Anthrax. In: , , , , , , eds. Manson's Tropical Diseases (23rd). China: Elsevier Saunders; . p. :395-398.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. . Epidemiology of infectious disease: general principles.Infectious Disease Epidemiology: Theory and Practice. (3rd). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning; . p. :19-44.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. . Geographic information systems.Infectious Disease Epidemiology: Theory and Practice. (3rd). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning; . p. :167-185.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. . Emerging and new infectious diseases. In: , , eds. , , eds. Infectious Disease Epidemiology: Theory and Practice (3rd). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning; . p. :329-367.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , . Injection anthrax–a new outbreak in heroin users. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2012;109(49):843-848.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , . Injectional anthrax - new presentation of an old disease. Euro Surveill. 2014;19(32):20877.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , . Outbreak of cutaneous anthrax in Musalimadugu village, Chittoor district, Andhra Pradesh, India, July-August 2011. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2012;6(10):695-699.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , , . A mini-outbreak of cutaneous anthrax in Vizianagaram District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2009;75(04):416-418.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , . Cutaneous anthrax, West Bengal, India, 2007. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15(03):497-499.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , . An outbreak of cutaneous anthrax in a non-endemic district–Visakhapatnam in Andhra Pradesh. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2005;71(02):102-105.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. , . Cutaneous anthrax: an Indian perspective. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2002;68(06):316-319.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , . Cutaneous anthrax of the eyelid. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2003;69(01):55.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , . Cutaneous anthrax: still a reality in India. Pediatr Dermatol. 2001;18(05):456-457.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , , . Anthrax in an infant. Indian Pediatr. 2001;38(07):777-779.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. . Cutaneous anthrax in two siblings. Indian J Pediatr. 2001;68(06):573-574.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. , , . Images in Medicine . Cutaneous anthrax. Postgrad Med J. 2000;76(898):472.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. , . Bacterial infections. In: , , , , , eds. Rook's Textbook of Dermatology Vol 26. (9th). Oxford, United Kingdom: Wiley Blackwell; . p. :1-26.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. . Anthrax. In: , , , eds. Tropical Dermatology (1st). China: Elsevier; . p. :359-361.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections